From the matchmaker's desk
How we built the matching system, what each signal contributes, and where its limits matter.
Written by Find Your Person. Product-mechanics articles are checked against the current implementation and public policies; planned behavior is labeled as planned.
Why we do not start with a profile stack.
Find Your Person asks for more context first, then uses it to recommend a smaller field of potential introductions.
Read more →What photo comparisons can teach a matching system.
Pairwise choices can personalize visual-preference signals. They cannot guarantee attraction, and they should not be treated as a popularity score.
Read more →What a modeled conversation can—and cannot—predict.
The simulation is a useful compatibility signal, not a rehearsal of the future and not a guarantee of chemistry.
Read more →How our AI matchmaking system uses six signals.
A transparent look at the baseline weights, reciprocal gate, and why no single model output decides an introduction.
Read more →What does reciprocal matching mean?
Why “you fit their preferences too” is a separate check—and why even two passing scores cannot promise mutual attraction.
Read more →Seven privacy questions to ask an AI dating app.
A practical checklist for interviews, voice data, photos, biometrics, messages, model providers, and account deletion.
Read more →Why a matchmaking app launches city by city.
Reciprocal preferences and local density make geography part of the product—not just a marketing rollout decision.
Read more →